Philadelphia Assault Lawyer

Law Offices of Mark D. Copoulos

Philadelphia Assault Lawyer

The government has the burden of proving assault beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the highest standard under the law. It often requires direct physical evidence such as photographs of injury.

Simple Assault and Aggravated Assault are some of the most common charges in the state of Pennsylvania.  They are also the most overly charged.  By definition, simple assault is an attempt to cause or intentionally causing bodily injury to another.  A slap on the face can be characterized as a simple assault along with a brutal fight.

Simple assault carries an offense gravity score (“OGS”) of three.  This means that if you are convicted of simple assault and have no prior criminal record, probation is likely if the incident happened in Philadelphia, PA. Still you should treat the charge of assault lightly. If you are convicted of simple assault you will have a criminal conviction that cannot be expunged.  There are many viable defenses to the allegations of simple assault which I will highlight below:

 

The government has the burden of proving you committed an assault beyond a reasonable doubt.  A reasonable doubt is the highest standard of doubt in our legal system.  It is the sort of doubt that causes one to pause or hesitate in making a major life decision.  Proving simple assault often requires some sort of direct or physical evidence. For example if a complainant alleges she was struck or slapped, a judge will want to see photographs of injury.  If the complainants entire case is that they were assaulted, but cannot provide physical evidence to corroborate their alleged injuries then the case may be won.

Finally, many assault cases lend themselves to building a strong defense. The defendant has a right to testify. In many assault cases the defendant will deny the allegations, or state the incident did not occur as stated. For example there may not have been an intent to commit a crime. Additionally, if the defendant was not the aggressor he or she may argue they were acting defensively and not criminally.

Defendants without a prior criminal record should call witnesses to testify to good character.  In Pennsylvania, good character alone is enough to conclude that a defendant is not guilty.  For example, if you are charged with simple assault and have never committed a crime before, you can call friends and family to testify that you have a reputation for being a peaceful citizen.  This will signal to the judge; 1.) that you are peaceful; and perhaps more importantly 2.) that you have no prior criminal record.

Patently false charges of assault should be patently denied.  If the government has no evidence then you should consider testifying.  It is important to remember that because they consequences of a simple assault charge are usually probation, it makes sense to take the case to trial. If you are convicted of assault you will likely get probation. If you plead guilty to assault you will likely get probation. Therefore, there may be an incentive to see whether the case can be won before surrendering your clear record to the government.

COMMON DEFENSES TO SIMPLE ASSAULT CHARGES

Self-defense – In Pennsylvania you have a legal right to defend yourself.  Moreover, it is the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that you were not acting in self-defense.  If you were not the aggressor then you may have been justified in defending yourself.

Defense of Others – In Pennsylvania you have a right to defend yourself and others.  If you were not the aggressor there may be an absolute defense to the charges against you.

“He Said / She Said” – In every criminal case, the government has the burden of proof.  This means the Commonwealth must prove assault beyond a reasonable doubt.  If there is no credible evidence against you, and the sole evidence is a testimonial witness, you may be able to argue the judge does not know who to believe.  If the judge does not know who to believe or what happened, in in theory the defendant must always be found not guilty.

Mutual Fight – If both parties agreed to fight each other than Defendant should have been charged with a misdemeanor of the third degree.  Moreover, you may have a defense that the government has not criminally charged the complaining witness. In such a situation, the judge will often find a defendant not guilty since both parties share culpability.

Look no further! You’ve found all qualities of superb representation that you’ve been looking for and more. Mark took a stressful, incomprehensible, life altering situation and made it  better with “Not guilty” being the verdict! Mark Copoulos is THE LAWYER to get the job done, and comes highly recommended.” – R.C., Simple Assault Client

Contact Us